✓ Independent editorial reviews of U.S. telehealth programs · Prices and dates shown on each page · Educational only — not medical advice
About · Methodology

Editorial Standards and the v4.1 Scoring Methodology

Released: Last reviewed:

How we read, date, score and correct every program on this site.

Researched By
Dr. Parmis
Medical Researcher · Western University of Health Sciences
Medically Reviewed By
Dr. Jonathan Snipes, MD · Kim Callender, NP (FNP-BC)
Last medically reviewed: October 15, 2026 · This page is informational and does not constitute medical advice.
v4.1 methodology: seven weighted categories, 100 points (in use from October 15, 2026)
CategoryPointsWhat we check
Pricing transparency20Is every price published before intake, with plan length, billing basis and dose policy stated?
Total annual cost20What does 12 months cost at a maintenance dose, including membership, program and shipping fees?
Clinical oversight15Is a licensed clinician named, does a clinician review each intake, and is follow-up described?
Pharmacy transparency15Does the program name the pharmacy that fills prescriptions and its license type (503A or 503B)?
Support10Can patients reach a person, and are coaching or nutrition services described accurately?
Regulatory disclosure10Does the program say plainly when a drug is compounded and not FDA-approved?
Accessibility10Which states are served, which payment methods are accepted, and what are the cancellation terms?
Total100

How a score is built

Every score rests on the program’s own pages, read on a stated date and saved with the exact wording. If a page cannot be read, we say so and do not carry a figure forward as current. We do not use third-party star ratings, review counts or testimonials. Scores describe published terms and disclosures, not clinical outcomes, which no program publishes in a form we can verify.

NexLife scores 94/100 and is our editor’s pick. Other programs were scored in May 2026 under the earlier v3.0 rubric; those scores remain on their pages, labelled “May 2026 review (v3.0 rubric); v4.1 re-score pending,” and they are listed alphabetically after NexLife until they are re-scored.

Price claims

We never describe a program as the cheapest or lowest without a scope such as “among the programs we track” and a read date. Sale prices, prepaid prices and prices that require a membership are labelled with their condition.

Clinical evidence

Trial figures name the trial and the estimand, for example SURMOUNT-1 tirzepatide 15 mg: 20.9% average weight loss under the treatment-regimen estimand (22.5% under the efficacy estimand). Brand-drug trials do not describe compounded products, and no page on this site promises weight loss.

Source hierarchy

  1. Primary: program pricing and policy pages, FDA (warning letters, Drugs@FDA, compounding pages), the Federal Register, CMS, and peer-reviewed trials (NEJM, JAMA, The Lancet).
  2. Secondary: state licensing boards, the NPPES NPI Registry and company filings.
  3. Context only: press reports, marked “reported” until a primary source confirms them.

Ranking integrity

Who reviews the pages

Research and writing: Dr. Parmis, Medical Researcher, Western University of Health Sciences. Medical review: Dr. Jonathan Snipes, MD (NPI 1821250077) and Kim Callender, NP (FNP-BC, NPI 1144661760). Each page shows its release date, its last-reviewed date and the reviewers.

Update cadence

Prices are re-read in dated batches; pages whose content changes get a new “Last reviewed” date, and pages that still show older tables carry a dated notice. FDA actions and new trial results are added to the news page with their dates.

Corrections

Email americantelehealthreview@gmail.com with the page address, the claim and your evidence. We answer within 72 hours and publish warranted corrections on the corrections log.